Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Becca Katz's avatar

Loved this - except I take issue with the portrayal of “just going outside to have fun” as a bad thing or gimmick (it’s actually really good for kids and you, as you know) or, more importantly, the implication that having fun is the only reason to go outdoors. When it’s not so bitterly cold, I challenge you to think about an outdoor nature-based learning exercise that is productive struggle. Let me know how it goes. ❤️

John Golden's avatar

Always such a good read, and thought provoking.

In every other area of life, I'm wary of A or B thinking. I tend to think that what we want is a middle path, and that there are usually two ways to err. So reading this makes me think that of course we need some productive struggle and not all productive struggle. But do I do that in math class? Is it different because most of my teaching is teacher education, and they have often had no experience of productive struggle. I'm hoping to move them to the middle. Yesterday we were doing unit conversion with elementary teachers. I did no technique, just showed them that google will convert really well. But we concentrated on the idea of some sense of what the units were, and how they compared, and knowing what that meant about when you converted, about how many should you expect.

Sorry, rambly. What I'm wondering is if you didn't have the enrichment time, would it be worth using a day of class every week or two for such lessons? Can you get that effect with curriculum topics?

11 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?